CUHK Researchers Find CSR Offers a Competitive Edge to Firms and Benefits Their Stakeholders

ID: 1455430
recent pressrelease next pressrelease

(businesspress24) - HONG KONG, CHINA -- (Marketwired) -- 08/31/16 -- The following article was first published in the China Business Knowledge (CBK) website by CUHK Business School - : Corporate social responsibility (CSR) has become an increasingly popular business activity over the years. More and more companies are actively finding ways to give back to the society -- some are engaged in environmental projects while others set out to help disadvantaged children in poverty. The very nature of helping others resonates in our human nature -- it makes us feel good to do well. However, in the corporate world, perhaps there is more to feeling good by doing good. As researchers in the find, CSR can be a strategy which helps to create a competitive edge for firms and make their peers in the industry want to follow suit.

"No firms operate in isolation. If CSR creates a competitive edge, its advantage should be mostly manifested through a firm''s competition with other firms," says Prof. Jie Cao, Associate Professor in the Department of Finance at CUHK Business School.

The study titled "Peer Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility" was written by Prof. Cao and his former PhD student Xintong Zhan who joined Erasmus University Rotterdam as Assistant Professor in Finance in August, alongside their collaborator Prof. Hao Liang from Singapore Management University.

Their study has attracted much positive attention by winning the Zephyr Prize as the best corporate finance paper in the 28th Australasian Finance & Banking Conference in Sydney, and being featured at the Harvard Law School Forum of Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation, as well as on 3BL Media, a leading news and content distribution company focusing on CSR and sustainability stories. Recently, it has also been presented in high-level events such as the 3rd Geneva Summit on Sustainable Finance in Switzerland, and at the Conference on the Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility in the BB&T Center for the STUDY of Capitalism in the United States.

Prof. Cao further explains by using an example that if a firm adopts a green technology in its production, it may be perceived as a threat to its peer firms, as some customers who are concerned about the environment may switch to work with the more environmental friendly firm. Investors of these peer firms will also be aware of the potential loss of their companies'' market shares.

"To catch up with their competitor and regain their edge, these peer firms will likely adopt similar technologies in the next period. In our study, we build on this competitive advantage perspective of CSR and examine whether and how a firm''s adoption of CSR can affect the practice and value of its peer firms," he says.

Taking a large sample of 3,452 U.S. public non-voting peer firms from 1997 to 2011, the study compares the effect of a firm''s shareholder-sponsored CSR proposals that pass or fail by a small margin of votes in annual meetings on its peer firms'' stock returns and future CSR performance.

"Close-call CSR proposals provide a source of random variation of a firm''s CSR that can be used to estimate the causal effect of CSR on its peer firm''s market valuation and CSR practice," Prof. Cao explains.

The study reveals that CSR does matter to peer firms by affecting stock returns and company strategies.

The researchers found that the passage of CSR proposals by a small margin of votes on average leads to a significant decrease in peer firms'' shareholder value compared with CSR proposals that are marginally rejected. This shows that CSR has strategic value and firms observing their peers adopting such strategic CSR practices could lose their competitive edge, causing a negative stock market reaction.

If this is the case, will a firm''s adoption of a CSR approach affect its peers to change their CSR practice? The answer is yes.

As the results show, when a firm adopts a CSR approach, its peer firms will significantly increase their CSR practice as well. This confirms that peer firms perceive CSR as a valuable business strategy and they will follow their rivals to adopt such practice in order to maintain their competitive edge in the market.

If CSR matters to peer firms, does the kind of strategy matter, too? Will the peer firms adopt similar CSR strategy adopted by their rivals or start their own initiatives? For example, if the voting firm passes a proposal to enhance its environment strategy which is perceived to be competitive by its peer firms, will these peers also adopt more environmental friendly CSR strategies?

The result is again positive with evidence showing that peer firms indeed match their CSR strategies with their competitors. Further analysis has been done on a few sub-dimensions of the most important aspects of CSR, including environment, employee relationship, and workforce diversity. The scores all support the researchers'' hypothesis that CSR is seen as an important strategy and will induce peer firms to follow specifically. When a firm adopts a CSR proposal focusing on specific dimensions such as environment, employment and workforce related issues, its peer firms significantly increase their CSR practice by upgrading their engagement in the same specific dimensions to stay competitive in the game.

The study also reveals that the competitive relationship between the firm and its peers plays an important role in shaping the peer effects of CSR -- the higher the competition, the more intense the peer effect. Such competitive relationship will lead to a more pronounced market reaction and bigger improvement of CSR future involvement of the peer firms. Moreover, peer effects are stronger in peer firms with greater information transparent information, that is, followed by more financial analysts or having a larger firm size.

If one follows the logic that CSR proposals create competitive advantages, one would then expect alliance partners of a firm that adopts new CSR proposals are more likely to benefit from such a competitive advantage through their connection, thus enhance their own CSR practice as well. According to the study, it is indeed the case: when a voting firm adopts a CSR initiative, its alliance partners will also significantly increase their CSR practice.

The study has filled the gap of previous research which shed little light on how the practice of CSR can influence the industry dynamics and their peers'' CSR practice. Not only has it confirmed the peer effects of CSR, thus promoting good practice among peers, it has significant policy implications as well.

"From the government''s perspective, it is good to have more companies taking part in CSR because it is ultimately good for the society. The government can certainly help by encouraging more firms to pay serious effort in CSR," says Prof. Cao.

"The effort in promoting CSR could be strategically adjusted according to the competitiveness of the industry. The competitive nature of the market would leverage the impact of the policy and help achieve an overall improvement in CSR. Therefore, more efforts are needed for promoting CSR in monopolistic and oligopolistic industries," he adds.

As for companies, they should do more CSR, according to Prof. Cao. "Doing more CSR will not only give them a competitive edge, but also benefit their stakeholders," he says.

Jie Cao, Hao Liang and Xintong Zhan, "", July 12, 2016. 28th Australasian Finance and Banking Conference Paper.

This article was first published in the China Business Knowledge (CBK) website by CUHK Business School: .

Company logo

CUHK Business School comprises two schools -- Accountancy and Hotel and Tourism Management -- and four departments -- Decision Sciences & Managerial Economics, Finance, Management and Marketing. Established in Hong Kong in 1963, it is the first business school to offer BBA, MBA and Executive MBA programs in the region. Today, the School offers 7 undergraduate programs and 13 graduate programs including MBA, EMBA, Master, MSc, MPhil and PhD.

In the Financial Times Global MBA Ranking 2016, CUHK MBA is ranked 26th. In FT''s 2015 EMBA ranking, CUHK EMBA is ranked 31st in the world. CUHK Business School has the largest number of business alumni (31,000+) in Hong Kong -- many of whom are key business leaders. The School currently has about 4,400 undergraduate and postgraduate students and Professor Kalok Chan is the Dean of CUHK Business School.

More information is available at: or by connecting with CUHK Business School on Facebook: and LinkedIn: .

CBK is a portal belonging to the Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) Business School which provides easy access to the China-related research conducted at CUHK Business School. Through feature articles, mini case studies, discussions and a research paper database, CBK aim to narrow the knowledge gap between China and the rest of the world, providing in-depth knowledge and practical tips about doing business in China. Free content is available at or by connecting with CBK(at)CUHK on Facebook: , Twitter: and LinkedIn: .

Edmond Siu

Senior Public Relations and Communications Manager
Tel: +852 3943 1842

More information: http:// http:// http://ww

Keywords (optional):


Company information / Profile:

PressRelease by


PressContact / Agency:

published by: Marketwired
print pressrelease  send to a friend  

Date: 08/31/2016 - 08:00
Language: English
News-ID 1455430
Character count: 752
Firma: The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) Business School
Ansprechpartner: Feedback to about Pressrelease-id:


Number of hits: 189


Direct Link to this PressRelease:

We would appreciate a link in your News-, Press- or Partner-Site.

Comments on this PressRelease

All members: 9 432
Register today: 0
Register yesterday: 0
Members online: 0
Guests online: 51

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.