businesspress24.com - Difference between Single Engine Management Systems & Twin Engine Management Systems
 

Difference between Single Engine Management Systems & Twin Engine Management Systems

ID: 1357996

Modern digital technology made possible the ability to capture and convey all of the information the pilots may want in a non-cluttered, easily understood and highly accurate manner.

(firmenpresse) - In pre-glass cockpit days, the number of engine status indicators in the cockpit used to be directly proportional to the number of engines in the aircraft. For example, a twin engine aircraft would generally have almost twice the number of dials as say a single engine aircraft.

Consequently, pilots in a multi-engine aircraft had a lot more dials to contend with. In fact, there were more dials then they could possibly manage to keep their eye on. To an extent, this dangerous situation was mitigated by the presence of the co-pilot and the flight engineer. Thus there was more than one pair of eyes keeping track on the engine and flight status.

Modern digital technology changed all that. Modern digital technology made possible the ability to capture and convey all of the information the pilots may want in a non-cluttered, easily understood and highly accurate manner.

Over the years, the size and complexity of the airplanes has grown. Even the humble twin engine aircraft has more than doubled in physical size. Pilots need to know the engine status at a glance and also aircraft’s precise location in relation to the flight path as well as the destination and also about any adverse weather that might affect aircraft performance.

Today, the cockpit instrument panel with its various individual instruments attached has evolved into a sophisticated computer-controlled digital interface with LCD display screens and prioritized messaging. In fact, even the LCD screens have given way to sophisticated touch screens dramatically reducing the number of physical buttons and switches.

Let us understand the specific differences between single engine management systems and twin engine management systems. As you are probably aware, there are three basic kinds of instruments in the cockpit; engine instruments, flight instruments and navigation instruments. For aircraft that carry passengers, there are some additional instruments that provide such data as cabin pressure, temperature and so on.





Whether single engine or Precision Engine Monitoring, the aircraft will have one set of instruments providing basic information such altitude, airspeed, magnetic direction, artificial horizon, turn coordinator, and vertical speed indicator. All these are often combined into a single digital display unit.

There is another set that provides engine related information. The only difference between engine instruments of single engine and twin engine Fuel gages is the physical size of the instrument panel and the quantum of data displayed.

Everything from pressure to temperature, fuel, oil quantity and tachometers for each engine is displayed in a single unit through use of multiple pointers on the same dial face.

The third set of instruments (and common to single and twin engine aircraft management systems) are the navigation Instruments. Modern navigation instruments are enormously sophisticated and generally incorporate Global position systems (GPS).

The leading manufacturer of all three types of modern day basic instruments for single and twin engine management is of course the California based J.P. Instruments. More information on them here: https://www.jpinstruments.com/


Themen in dieser Pressemitteilung:


Unternehmensinformation / Kurzprofil:

J.P.Instruments was founded in 1986 in Huntington Beach, California, USA. J.P. Instruments is leader in aircraft engine data management systems and has added a whole line of reliable and cost effective aircraft instrumentation to its name.



Leseranfragen:



PresseKontakt / Agentur:



drucken  als PDF  an Freund senden  UniPixel Reports First Quarter 2015 Results
Agreeing With Vicor, the Patent Trial and Appeals Board Rules That All Claims of a SynQor Patent Are Invalid
Bereitgestellt von Benutzer: jpinstrumentspr
Datum: 12.05.2015 - 06:04 Uhr
Sprache: Deutsch
News-ID 1357996
Anzahl Zeichen: 0

contact information:
Contact person: Joseph Polizzotto
Town:

3185-B Airway Ave, Costa Mesa, CA 92626


Phone: l 714-557-3805

Kategorie:

Electronic Components


Anmerkungen:


Diese Pressemitteilung wurde bisher 238 mal aufgerufen.


Die Pressemitteilung mit dem Titel:
"Difference between Single Engine Management Systems & Twin Engine Management Systems
"
steht unter der journalistisch-redaktionellen Verantwortung von

J.P. Instruments Inc. (Nachricht senden)

Beachten Sie bitte die weiteren Informationen zum Haftungsauschluß (gemäß TMG - TeleMedianGesetz) und dem Datenschutz (gemäß der DSGVO).


Alle Meldungen von J.P. Instruments Inc.



 

Who is online

All members: 10 565
Register today: 0
Register yesterday: 2
Members online: 0
Guests online: 92


Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.