businesspress24.com - Agrium Reports Record Second Quarter
 

Agrium Reports Record Second Quarter

ID: 1026941

(firmenpresse) - CALGARY, ALBERTA -- (Marketwire) -- 08/03/11 -- ALL AMOUNTS ARE STATED IN U.S.$

Agrium Inc. (TSX: AGU) (NYSE: AGU) announced today record consolidated net earnings ("net earnings") of $718-million ($4.54 diluted earnings per share) for the second quarter of 2011, compared with net earnings of $518-million in the second quarter of 2010 ($3.28 diluted earnings per share). Net earnings from continuing operations, which exclude earnings associated with the AWB Limited ("AWB") Commodity Management businesses, the majority of which was sold to Cargill, Incorporated ("Cargill") on May 11, 2011, were $728-million ($4.60 diluted earnings per share) for the second quarter of 2011.

"Agrium's competitive advantages and strong global position across our business units and products allowed us to fully capitalize on the strengthening agricultural fundamentals and achieve record results this quarter. Despite this spring being one of the wettest and latest in history across much of North America, our diversity throughout the value chain enabled us to deliver record earnings. Growers in the Eastern U.S. corn belt and Western Canada in particular were not able to plant all the acreage, or apply all the nutrients, they would have liked to this spring. Global crop and crop nutrient markets remain tight. The combination of all these factors is expected to bode well for crop input demand this fall and Agrium will be there to provide the products necessary for growers to maximize their yields and returns," said Agrium President & CEO Mike Wilson.

"Agrium continued to deliver on its value-add growth objectives this quarter. Our Wholesale business unit expanded its fertilizer distribution capability in Europe with the acquisition of Cerealtoscana and Agroport. Our Retail and Advanced Technologies business units announced the purchase of Tetra Micronutrients, a producer and distributor of custom liquid plant nutrition and dry micro nutrient products. More recently, Advanced Techologies announced the closing of the purchase for Evergro, a leading manufacturer and distributor of horticultural and professional turf products in Western Canada. Agrium also concluded the sale of the majority of the AWB Commodity Management businesses to Cargill, allowing us to focus our efforts on realizing the full potential of the Landmark retail business in Australia," added Mr. Wilson.





The 2011 second quarter results include a pre-tax share-based payment recovery of $10-million ($0.04 diluted earnings per share). Excluding this item, net earnings from continuing operations would have been $721-million ($4.56 diluted earnings per share from continuing operations) for the second quarter of 2011.(1)

Consistent with our past practice, we intend to provide earnings guidance for the second half of the year when we release our third quarter results for 2011.

(1) Second quarter effective tax rate of 28 percent used for adjusted diluted earnings per share calculations.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

August 3, 2011

Unless otherwise indicated, the financial information presented and discussed in this Management's Discussion and Analysis ("MD&A") is prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board ("IASB"), and all comparisons of results for the second quarter of 2011 (three months ended June 30, 2011) are against results for the second quarter of 2010 (three months ended June 30, 2010) and all comparisons of results for the first half of 2011 (six months ended June 30, 2011) are against results for the first half of 2010 (six months ended June 30, 2010). All dollar amounts refer to United States ("U.S.") dollars except where otherwise stated.

The following interim MD&A updates our annual MD&A included in our 2010 Annual Report to Shareholders, to which our readers are referred and is as of August 3, 2011. The Board of Directors carries out its responsibility for review of this disclosure principally through its Audit Committee, comprised exclusively of independent directors. The Audit Committee reviews, and prior to publication, approves, pursuant to the authority delegated to it by the Board of Directors this disclosure. No update is provided where an item is not material or there has been no material change from the discussion in our annual MD&A. Forward-Looking Statements are outlined after the Outlook, Key Risks and Uncertainties section of this press release.

2011 Second Quarter Operating Results

CONSOLIDATED NET EARNINGS

Agrium's 2011 second quarter consolidated net earnings ("net earnings") were $718-million, or $4.54 diluted earnings per share, compared to net earnings of $518-million, or $3.28 diluted earnings per share, for the same quarter of 2010. Net earnings for the first half of 2011 were $889-million, or $5.62 diluted earnings per share, compared to $517-million, or $3.27 diluted earnings per share.

Our consolidated gross profit for the second quarter and first half of 2011 increased by $612-million and $975-million, respectively, primarily due to higher gross profit from all three of our strategic business units, with highlights as follows:

- An increase in Wholesale's gross profit of $346-million and $537-million for the second quarter and first half of 2011, respectively, as higher crop pricing drove up demand and selling prices for all major products.

- The addition of the Landmark Retail operations accounted for an increase of $116-million and $215-million in Retail's gross profit for the second quarter and first half of 2011, respectively, with over half of the contribution coming from merchandise and other services.

- Excluding Landmark, Retail's gross profit increased by $161-million in the second quarter of 2011 and $240-million in the first half of 2011 due to higher fertilizer pricing and higher sales volume for crop protection products and seeds.

The $294-million increase in expenses for the second quarter of 2011 was primarily driven by:

- Higher Retail selling and general and administrative expenses due to the addition of the Landmark business in the fourth quarter of 2010 and other recent acquisitions.

- An $81-million increase in expenses for our Other non-operating business unit (see section "Other" for discussion on the drivers behind this increase in expenses).

Our consolidated EBIT increased by $318-million for the second quarter of 2011.

The $427-million increase in expenses for the first half of 2011 was primarily driven by:

- Higher Retail selling and general and administrative expenses due to the addition of the Landmark business in the fourth quarter of 2010 and other recent acquisitions.

- A $123-million increase in expenses for our Other non-operating business unit (see section "Other" for discussion on the drivers behind this increase in expenses).

Our consolidated EBIT increased by $548-million for the first half of 2011.

Below is a summary of our other expenses (income) for the second quarter and first half of 2011 and 2010:

The effective tax rate was 28 percent for the second quarter and first half of 2011 compared to the effective tax rate of 26 percent for the same periods last year. The increase in the effective tax rate was due to the recognition of a previously unrecognized tax benefit in 2010.

BUSINESS SEGMENT PERFORMANCE

Retail

Retail reported record second quarter results this year for sales, gross profit, EBIT and EBITDA. Second quarter sales were $4.6-billion, a 39 percent increase over the $3.3-billion in the second quarter of 2010. Gross profit during the quarter was $996-million, which is significantly greater than the $719-million reported for the same period last year. EBIT also improved to $486-million in the second quarter of 2011, an increase over the $361-million from the second quarter of 2010. Retail's performance this quarter was due to robust demand for all crop inputs and related services globally, including strong benchmark prices for all major nutrients. The strong second quarter results were achieved despite extremely wet conditions across the U.S. Corn Belt and Western Canada which delayed the spring season significantly.

Crop nutrient sales were $2.1-billion in the second quarter of 2011, compared to $1.4-billion for the same period last year. The increase was attributable to higher nutrient selling prices and sales volumes during the quarter compared to the same period last year. Higher sales volumes were due to the inclusion of the Landmark business which offset slightly lower sales volumes in North America due to challenging weather conditions this spring. Gross profit was $377-million this quarter, compared to $252-million in the second quarter of 2010. Total crop nutrient margins were 18 percent in the second quarter of 2011, similar to the same quarter last year.

North American crop nutrient margins increased to 20 percent this quarter versus 18 percent reported last year due to prudent inventory management and purchases. We anticipate strong North American fall demand as growers continue to focus on maximizing yields and acreage to take advantage of high grain prices and attractive margins.

Crop protection sales were $1.5-billion in the second quarter of 2011, an 18 percent increase over the $1.2-billion in sales during the same period last year. Gross profit this quarter was $325-million, compared with $274-million in the second quarter of 2010. The increase in both sales and gross profit was due largely to the inclusion of the Landmark business, as well as increased demand for fungicide products related to the wet spring experienced in North America this quarter. Crop protection product margins were 22 percent for the second quarter of 2011, similar to the same period last year.

Seed sales were $687-million in the second quarter of 2011, compared to $588-million in the same period last year. North American sales accounted for almost 70 percent of the increase. Higher sales of corn and cotton seed contributed to this increase in sales as growers shifted acreage to these more profitable crops. Gross profit this quarter was $132-million compared to $106-million in the second quarter of 2010.

Merchandise sales totaled $208-million in the second quarter of 2011 compared to $29-million in the second quarter of 2010. Gross profit from merchandise sales was $27-million in the current quarter compared to $3-million in the same period last year. The increase in sales and gross profit was due primarily to the addition of the Landmark business.

Sales of application and other services were $180-million in the second quarter of 2011 compared to $93-million in the second quarter of 2010. Gross profit totaled $135-million this quarter, compared to $84-million in the second quarter of 2010. The significant increase in sales and gross profit over the previous year was due to the addition of the Landmark livestock and other agency businesses, as well as strong demand for crop application services in North America as a result of high crop prices and a shortened spring planting season.

Retail selling expenses for the second quarter of 2011 were $473-million, compared to $329-million in the same quarter of 2010. The increase was due primarily to the inclusion of the Landmark retail business and recent acquisitions, as well as higher incentive costs related to the current quarter's excellent results. Selling expenses as a percentage of sales in the second quarter of 2011 were 10 percent, similar to the same period last year.

Wholesale

Wholesale's sales were $1.7-billion for the second quarter of 2011, the highest second quarter on record, and 54 percent higher than the $1.1-billion achieved in the second quarter of 2010. Gross profit was a record $620-million in the second quarter of 2011, which is more than double the $274-million reported in the same period in 2010. Wholesale also reported a second quarter EBIT of $569-million in 2011, substantially higher than the $276-million earned in the second quarter of 2010. The improvement in earnings was due to higher realized crop nutrient prices and margins, as well as excellent product demand which occurred later in the spring season. The strong second quarter results were achieved despite extremely wet conditions across the U.S. Corn Belt and Western Canada which significantly delayed spring nutrient application.

Nitrogen gross profit was a record $324-million this quarter, more than double the $138-million reported in the same quarter last year due to a combination of higher prices and increased sales volumes. Prices for all nitrogen products were higher on average than last year for both benchmark and Agrium's realized prices due to strong market fundamentals. Nitrogen sales volumes increased when compared to the same period last year, as higher urea and UAN sales more than offset lower domestic ammonia sales due to the late spring season in North America. As well, higher utilization at the plants achieved an 11 percent average increase in production volumes compared to the same quarter last year. Nitrogen cost of product sold was $274 per tonne this quarter, similar to the $273 per tonne in the second quarter of last year. Nitrogen margins averaged $226 per tonne this quarter, compared with $109 per tonne in the second quarter of last year.

For the second quarter of 2011, Agrium's average natural gas cost in cost of product sold was $4.00/MMBtu ($4.11MMBtu including the impact of realized losses on natural gas derivatives) compared to $3.91/MMBtu for the same period in 2010 ($4.69/MMBtu including the impact of realized losses on natural gas derivatives). Hedging gains or losses on all gas derivatives are reported below gross profit in other expenses and therefore not included in cost of product sold. The U.S. benchmark (NYMEX) natural gas price for the second quarter of 2011 was $4.36/MMBtu, compared to $4.07/MMBtu in the same quarter last year and $4.14/MMBtu in the first quarter of 2011. The AECO (Alberta) basis differential was a $0.46/MMBtu discount to NYMEX in the second quarter of 2011, which was higher than the second quarter of 2010.

Potash gross profit for the second quarter of 2011 was $165-million, compared to $109-million in the same quarter last year. The significant increase was due to the continued expansion in margins driven by stronger domestic and international prices on tight global supply/demand conditions. Sales volumes were 543,000 tonnes this quarter, compared to 529,000 tonnes in the second quarter of 2010. The increase was due entirely to higher international sales as a result of increased global demand. Domestic sales tonnage was slightly lower than the same period last year due to the delay in the spring season. The cost of product sold was $173 per tonne this quarter, slightly higher than the $161 reported in the same period last year due to increased freight costs and higher labour and maintenance costs. Gross margin on a per tonne basis was $304 this quarter, which represents a substantial increase over the gross margin of $205 per tonne realized during the same quarter in 2010.

Phosphate gross profit was $83-million this quarter, well above the $9-million reported for the second quarter of 2010. The increase was primarily due to higher realized sales prices which averaged $795 per tonne for the quarter, compared to $553 per tonne for the second quarter of 2010. Phosphate sales volumes were also slightly higher than the same period last year. Additionally, our Redwater and Conda plants achieved exceptionally higher production volumes (24 percent and 35 percent respectively) versus the second quarter last year. Phosphate cost of product sold was $475 per tonne, $39 per tonne lower than the same period last year as a result of a major turnaround completed at Agrium's Redwater, Alberta facility in the second quarter of 2010. The resulting gross margin per tonne was significantly higher at $320 per tonne, versus $39 per tonne in the second quarter of 2010.

Gross profit for product purchased for resale was $22-million, $18-million higher than the second quarter of 2010. This substantial increase was due to significantly higher sales volumes and margins as a result of strong global demand for all three nutrients. Gross margins in the second quarter of 2011 of $22 per tonne were $17 per tonne higher than the same quarter last year.

Second quarter Wholesale expenses were $51-million, $53-million higher than the same period last year. Mark-to-market gains on natural gas and other derivatives were $3-million in the second quarter of 2011 compared to $31-million in gains for the same period in 2010. Realized losses on natural gas and other derivatives were $3-million compared to a loss of $18-million in 2010. Potash profit and capital taxes were $14-million higher this quarter than the same period last year due primarily to higher margins. In addition, higher incentive accruals for this quarter increased Wholesale expenses compared to the same period last year.

Advanced Technologies

Advanced Technologies'("AAT") second quarter 2011 gross profit was $37-million compared to $31-million in the second quarter of 2010. This increase in gross profit was due to substantially higher sales volumes of Environmentally Smart Nitrogen ("ESN") this quarter as a result of new ESN production that came on line during 2010 at our New Madrid facility, which operated at near capacity for the current quarter.

EBIT this quarter was $13-million versus $15-million in the second quarter of 2010. Higher selling and general and administrative costs offset improved sales and resulting gross profit in the second quarter of 2011 compared to the same period last year. Selling and general and administrative costs for AAT were $5-million higher this quarter versus the same period in 2010 due primarily to the expansion of the Direct Solutions sales force as part of our plan to grow our retail sales to turf and ornamental customers, along with related support costs. Other income decreased by $3-million in the second quarter of 2011 compared to the same period last year due to foreign exchange losses and other expense items offsetting higher earnings from our equity ownership in Hanfeng Evergreen Inc.

Other

EBIT for our Other non-operating business unit for the second quarter of 2011 was a loss of $20-million, compared to earnings of $78-million for the second quarter of 2010. This change was primarily driven by:

- A $47-million decrease in share-based payment recovery.

- An $18-million increase in provision for environmental remediation and asset retirement obligations.

- A $17-million decrease in gross profit reflecting lower recognition of gross profit on Wholesale products sold to Retail that have been sold to external customers.

EBIT for Other for the first half of 2011 was a loss of $118-million, compared to earnings of $29-million for the same period of 2010. This change in EBIT reflected:

- A $52-million gain realized from the sale of 1.2 million shares of CF Industries Holdings, Inc. ("CF") in the first quarter of 2010.

- A $68-million increase in general and administrative expense due to a $23-million unfavourable change in share-based payment expense and the addition of the AWB business.

- An increase in net realized and unrealized loss from foreign exchange derivatives of $40-million which were entered into in anticipation of the sale of the Commodity Management businesses to Cargill. This was almost completely offset by a $39-million increase in foreign exchange gain primarily from the remeasurement of intercompany loans.

FINANCIAL CONDITION

The following are changes to working capital on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets in the six-month period ended June 30, 2011.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Below is a summary of our cash provided by or used in operating, investing, and financing activities as reflected in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:

OUTSTANDING SHARE DATA

The number of Agrium's outstanding shares as at July 31, 2011 was approximately 158 million. As at July 31, 2011, the number of shares issuable pursuant to stock options outstanding (issuable assuming full conversion, where each option granted can be exercised for one common share) was approximately 0.4 million.

The agricultural products business is seasonal in nature. Consequently, sales and gross profit comparisons made on a year-over-year basis are more appropriate than quarter-over-quarter. Crop input sales are primarily concentrated in the spring and fall crop input application seasons, which are in the second quarter and fourth quarter. Crop nutrient inventories are normally accumulated leading up to the application season. Cash collections generally occur after the application season is complete in the Americas and Australia. Our recent acquisition of AWB, which has a majority of its earnings from the second and third quarters of the calendar year, may have some impact on comparability.

Effective January 1, 2011, Agrium adopted IFRS as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. The selected quarterly information for 2011 and 2010 are presented based on IFRS, while those for 2009 are presented based on Canadian GAAP. As such, direct comparison may not be appropriate.

BUSINESS ACQUISITIONS

On December 3, 2010, we acquired 100 percent of AWB, an agribusiness operating in Australia, for $1.2-billion in cash and $37-million of acquisition costs. On May 11, 2011, we completed the sale of the majority of the Commodity Management businesses acquired from AWB, in accordance with an agreement dated December 15, 2010 (for further discussion, see section "Discontinued Operations"). Cash received from the sale was $694-million. We retained the Landmark retail operations, including over 200 company-owned retail locations and over 140 retail franchise and wholesale customer locations in Australia. The acquired business is included in the Retail operating segment.

As part of the acquisition, we acquired a 50 percent interest in Hi-Fert Pty. Ltd. ("Hi-Fert"), over which receivers and administrators have been appointed. Previously recorded amounts have been written off. AWB had provided guarantees for letters of credit of approximately $62-million issued by lenders supporting operations of Hi-Fert. The amount, if any, that we will be required to pay under these guarantees, net of recoveries from a charge over related assets, is not determinable, pending the outcome of bankruptcy and litigation proceedings.

On May 2, 2011, we acquired 100 percent of Cerealtoscana S.p.A. ("CT"), and its subsidiary Agroport, for total consideration of $27-million plus working capital. CT is a fertilizer distribution company in Italy and Agroport is its subsidiary in Romania. The acquired business is included in the Wholesale operating segment.

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

Discontinued operations include the operation of Commodity Management businesses and AWB Harvest Finance Limited sold on May 11, 2011. Also included are the operations and assets and liabilities of the Commodity Management businesses not included in the sale. We have agreed to various terms and conditions and indemnifications pursuant to the sale of the Commodity Management business, including an indemnity by AWB for litigation related to the Oil-For-Food Programme, as described in note 2 of our Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011.

Net loss from discontinued operations was $10-million for the second quarter of 2011 and net earnings of $1-million for the first half of 2011, compared to nil in the same periods of 2010.

NON-IFRS FINANCIAL MEASURES

In the discussion of our performance for the quarter, in addition to the primary measures of earnings and earnings per share reported in accordance with IFRS, we make reference to EBITDA (earnings (loss) from continuing operations before finance costs, income taxes, depreciation and amortization). We consider EBITDA to be a useful measure of performance because income tax jurisdictions and business segments are not synonymous and we believe that allocation of income tax charges distorts the comparability of historical performance for the different business segments. Similarly, financing and related interest charges cannot be allocated to all business units on a basis that is meaningful for comparison with other companies.

EBITDA is not a recognized measure under IFRS, and our method of calculation may not be comparable to other companies. Similarly, EBITDA should not be used as an alternative to net earnings from continuing operations as determined in accordance with IFRS.

The following table is a reconciliation of EBITDA to consolidated net earnings from continuing operations as calculated in accordance with IFRS:

ACCOUNTING STANDARDS AND CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

Please refer to note 1 of our Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 for our significant accounting policies and critical accounting estimates, which includes, among others, purchase price allocations in business combinations; collectability of receivables; rebates; net realizable value of inventory; estimated useful lives and impairment of long-lived assets; goodwill impairment testing; allocation of acquisition purchase prices; asset retirement obligations; environmental remediation; employee future benefits; share-based payments; income taxes; fair value of financial assets and liabilities; and, amounts and likelihood of contingencies.

BUSINESS RISKS

The information presented on risk management and key business risks on pages 70 - 79 in our 2010 Annual Report has not changed materially since December 31, 2010.

CONTROLS & PROCEDURES

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

OUTLOOK, KEY RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES

Global agricultural fundamentals and markets were strong in the second quarter of 2011. The FAO food price index reached an all-time record in April 2011, not only showing very widespread strength among crop prices, but also record meat prices and historically high dairy prices. U.S. cash corn prices in the second quarter of 2011 were the highest on record. Looking ahead, the outlook for agricultural markets remains positive. Despite revisions upward in both corn ending stocks and 2011 planted area, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) projects that stocks of corn at the end of 2010/11 and 2011/12 will amount to less than 30 days consumption, which is very tight by historical standards.

The global macroeconomic situation presents some risks which have the potential to impact agricultural markets. Significant uncertainty surrounds the outcome of sovereign debt problems in Greece and Portugal, among other European nations and the record high U.S. government debt levels.

Crop protection markets remain competitive, but margins have stabilized in recent months. Demand for crop protection products in North America has been strong due to attractive grower economics and improving crop conditions in several areas of North America. We are expecting strong 2011 winter wheat seed and 2012 corn and cotton seed sales based on a favorable outlook for prices and seeded area.

Nitrogen markets rose throughout the second quarter of 2011 driven by tight supplies and strong demand. The Chinese government imposed a sliding scale export tax in place of the 7 percent flat tax applied to exports during the low-tax period in 2010. The uncertainty around the new punitive sliding scale export tax reduced the volume of Chinese exports offered for sale prior to July 1, 2011. While it is uncertain how much urea China will export in the July through October export period, analysts project that full-year 2011 exports will be about half of 2010 levels, when exports exceeded 7 million tonnes. Global urea import demand was strong in the second quarter. In the January through May 2011 period, Brazilian urea imports rose at a record pace and were up 29 percent compared with 2010. Meanwhile, Indian urea imports were up over 40 percent from 2010 levels during January through May 2011. The outlook for nitrogen in the second half of 2011 is positive, driven by the expectation of continued import demand strength and lower exports from China than a year ago.

The global phosphate supply and demand balance tightened during the second quarter, despite the onset of the Chinese DAP/MAP export season beginning June 1. Similar to urea, the Chinese government instituted a sliding scale export tax on DAP/MAP exports. China is an important source of phosphate to India and the reduction in available Chinese export supplies has contributed to a tightening in global phosphate supplies. Global phosphate export supplies have also been reduced by production shut-downs in Tunisia, where political unrest has disrupted phosphate rock supply. Brazilian DAP/MAP imports are up 75 percent in the January through May period in 2011 versus 2010 and have been a major driver of phosphate market strength over the past couple of months. Looking ahead to the second half of 2011, India is expected to make significant purchases and South American demand is normally the highest during the July through October period. From a supply perspective, producers entered the second half with low inventories according to The Fertilizer Institute (TFI). U.S. DAP/MAP inventories were reported to be down 31 percent compared to June 2010 levels and 28 percent below the five year average in June 2011. The Ma'aden Phosphate Company has started producing small volumes of DAP at its Saudia Arabian phosphate plant. The first vessel is expected to ship in August, but significant export volumes are not expected until 2012.

The global potash market continued to strengthen in the second quarter. Globally, current potash supplies are tight. North American potash producers produced at 95 percent of previous monthly peak production through the first half of 2011 according to TFI data. High capacity utilization rates have not rebuilt potash inventories, and TFI data for June 2011 showed North American potash inventories were 14 percent below May 2011 levels and 27 percent below both June 2010 and five year average levels. Global demand for potash is strong, with Brazilian imports of potash 48 percent higher in 2011 versus 2010 levels in the January through May period. China has negotiated supply agreements for the second half of 2011 at significantly higher prices than first half levels. The timing of an Indian potash supply agreement remains uncertain, but analysts report that domestic inventories are extremely tight and new supplies are needed, which may be a challenge in the short term due to tight global export supplies.

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements and other information included in this MD&A constitute "forward looking information" within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation or constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of applicable U.S. securities legislation (collectively, the "forward-looking statements"). All statements in this MD&A, other than those relating to historical information or current conditions, are forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, statements as to management's expectations with respect to: future crop and crop input volumes, demand, margins, prices and sales; business and financial prospects; and other plans, strategies, objectives and expectations, including with respect to future operations of Agrium. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control, which could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking statements.

All of the forward-looking statements are qualified by the assumptions that are stated or inherent in such forward-looking statements, including the assumptions listed below. Although Agrium believes that these assumptions are reasonable, this list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect any of the forward-looking statements and the reader should not place an undue reliance on these assumptions and such forward-looking statements. The key assumptions that have been made in connection with the forward-looking statements include Agrium's ability to successfully integrate and realize the anticipated benefits of its acquisitions, including the acquisition of retained AWB businesses.

Events or circumstances that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements, include, but are not limited to: general economic, market and business conditions, weather conditions including impacts from regional flooding and/or drought conditions; crop prices; the supply and demand and price levels for our major products; governmental and regulatory requirements and actions by governmental authorities, including changes in government policy, changes in environmental, tax and other laws or regulations and the interpretation thereof, and political risks, including civil unrest, actions by armed groups or conflict. Additionally, there are risks associated with Agrium's recent acquisition of AWB, including: size and timing of expected synergies could be less favourable than anticipated; AWB is subject to dispute and litigation risk (including as a result of being named in litigation commenced by the Iraqi Government relating to the United Nations Oil-For-Food Programme), as well as counterparty and sovereign risk; and other risk factors detailed from time to time in Agrium reports filed with the Canadian securities regulators and the Securities and Exchange Commission in the United States.

Agrium disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements in this press release as a result of new information or future events, except as may be required under applicable U.S. federal securities laws or applicable Canadian securities legislation.

OTHER

Agrium Inc. is a major Retail supplier of agricultural products and services in North America, South America and Australia and a leading global Wholesale producer and marketer of all three major agricultural nutrients and the premier supplier of specialty fertilizers in North America through our Advanced Technologies business unit. Agrium's strategy is to grow across the value chain through acquisition, incremental expansion of its existing operations and through the development, commercialization and marketing of new products and international opportunities. Our strategy places particular emphasis on growth opportunities that both increase and stabilize our earnings profile in the continuing transformation of Agrium.

A WEBSITE SIMULCAST of the 2011 2nd Quarter Conference Call will be available in a listen-only mode beginning Wednesday, August 3, 2011 at 9:30 a.m. MT (11:30 a.m. ET). Please visit the following website:

AGRIUM INC.

Summarized Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

For the six months ended June 30, 2011

(Millions of U.S. dollars, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

1. CORPORATE INFORMATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Corporate information

Agrium Inc. is incorporated under the laws of Canada with common shares listed under the symbol "AGU" on the New York Stock Exchange and the Toronto Stock Exchange. Agrium is a major retail supplier of agricultural products and services in North and South America and Australia and a leading global producer and marketer of agricultural nutrients and industrial products. We produce and market three primary groups of nutrients: nitrogen, phosphate and potash as well as controlled-release crop nutrients and micronutrients. Our Corporate head office is located at 13131 Lake Fraser Drive S.E. Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Our operations are conducted globally from our Wholesale head office in Calgary, and our Retail and Advanced Technologies head offices in Loveland, Colorado, U.S.

Basis of preparation and statement of compliance

These condensed consolidated interim financial statements ("interim financial statements") of Agrium Inc. were approved for issuance by the Audit Committee on August 2, 2011. We prepared the interim financial statements in accordance with IAS 34 Interim Financial Reporting using accounting policies consistent with International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") issued by the International Accounting Standards Board ("IASB"). We prepared our first interim financial statements for our first quarter of 2011 as part of the period covered by our first consolidated annual financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS for the year ending December 31, 2011. Disclosures concerning the transition from Canadian generally accepted accounting principles to IFRS are provided in note 19. These interim financial statements do not include all disclosures normally provided in consolidated annual financial statements and should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Seasonality in our business results from the increased demand for our products during planting seasons. Sales are generally higher in the spring and fall.

These interim financial statements are presented in U.S. dollars, which is our presentation and functional currency. We have prepared these interim financial statements using the historical cost basis except for certain financial instruments and non-current assets, liabilities for cash-settled share-based payment arrangements, and assets and obligations of post-employment benefit plans. Our policies for these items are set out in the notes below.

Significant accounting policies

a) Key accounting estimates and judgments

The preparation of financial statements requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Estimates are used when accounting for items such as collectability of receivables, rebates, net realizable value of inventory, estimated useful lives and impairment of long-lived assets, goodwill impairment testing, allocation of acquisition purchase prices, asset retirement obligations, environmental remediation, employee future benefits, share-based payments, income taxes, fair value of financial assets and liabilities and amounts and likelihood of contingencies. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognized in the period in which the estimates are revised and in any future periods affected.

b) Principles of consolidation

Subsidiaries

These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Agrium Inc., its subsidiaries, and its proportionate share of revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities of joint ventures, which are the entities over which Agrium has control. Control exists when the company has the power, directly or indirectly, to govern the financial and operating policies of an entity so as to obtain benefit from its activities. In these interim financial statements, we, us, our and Agrium mean Agrium Inc., its subsidiaries and joint ventures. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.

Associates

Associates are those entities in which we have significant influence, but not control, over the financial and operating policies. Significant influence is presumed to exist when we hold between 20 and 50 percent of the voting power of another entity, but can also arise if we hold less than 20 percent of an entity if we have the power to be actively involved and influential in policy decisions affecting the entity.

Investments in associates are accounted for using the equity method and are recognized initially at cost. Our investment includes goodwill identified on acquisition, net of any accumulated impairment losses. The consolidated financial statements include our share of the income and expenses and equity movements of equity accounted investees from the date that significant influence commences until the date that it ceases.

Joint ventures

Joint ventures are those entities over whose activity we have joint control, established by contractual agreement and requiring unanimous consent for strategic financial and operating decisions. Jointly controlled entities are accounted for using proportionate consolidation. Our share of the assets, liabilities, income and expenses of jointly controlled entities are combined with the equivalent items in the consolidated financial statements on a line by line basis. Where we transact with our jointly controlled entities, unrealized profits and losses are eliminated to the extent of our interest in the joint venture.

c) Business combinations

Acquisitions of subsidiaries and businesses are accounted for using the acquisition method. The consideration for each acquisition is measured at the aggregate of the fair values at the date of exchange of assets given, liabilities incurred or assumed, and equity instruments we issued in exchange for control of the acquiree. Acquisition-related costs are recognized in net earnings as incurred.

The interest of non-controlling shareholders in the acquiree is initially measured at the non-controlling shareholders' proportion of the net fair value of the assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities recognized.

d) Foreign currency translation

The functional currency for each of our subsidiaries, jointly controlled entities and associates is the currency of the primary economic environment in which they operate, which is the U.S. dollar, the Canadian dollar, the Australian dollar, the New Zealand dollar and the Euro. Determining the primary economic environment in which an entity operates requires management to consider several factors and use judgment.

All transactions that are not denominated in an entity's functional currency are foreign currency transactions. These transactions are initially recorded in the functional currency by applying the appropriate monthly average rate which best approximates the actual rate of the transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are re-measured at the functional currency rate of exchange at the balance sheet date. All differences are recognized in the consolidated statement of operations. Non monetary items measured at historical cost are not re-measured - they remain at the exchange rate from the date of the transaction. Non monetary items measured at fair value in a foreign currency are translated using the exchange rates at the date when the fair value was determined.

The assets and liabilities of foreign operations that are not denominated in the presentation currency, including goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on acquisition, are translated to our presentation currency at exchange rates at the reporting date. Income, expenses and capital transactions are translated at the average exchange rate for the month. Foreign currency differences are recognized directly in equity. When a foreign operation is disposed of, the relevant amount of foreign currency translation in equity is reclassified to net earnings.

e) Revenue recognition

Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable. We recognize revenue based on individual contractual terms when all of the following criteria are met: the significant risks and rewards of ownership of the goods have been transferred to the customer; we retain neither continuing managerial involvement to the degree usually associated with ownership nor effective control over the goods sold; the amount of revenue and costs incurred or to be incurred can be measured reliably; and, it is probable that the economic benefits associated with the transaction will flow to us. These conditions are generally satisfied when title passes to the customer according to the sales agreement which in most cases, is when product is picked up by the customer or delivered to the destination specified by the customer, which is typically a customer's premises, the vessel on which the product will be shipped, or the destination port. Revenue is reported net of sales taxes, returns, discounts and rebates.

f) Rebates

We enter into agreements with suppliers providing for vendor rebates typically based on the achievement of specified purchase volumes or sales levels. We account for rebates and prepay discounts as a reduction of the prices of the suppliers' products. Rebates that are probable and can be reasonably estimated are accrued based on total estimated crop year performance. Rebates that are not probable or estimable are accrued when certain milestones are achieved. Rebates not covered by binding agreements or published vendor programs are accrued when conclusive documentation of right of receipt is obtained.

Rebates based on the amount of materials purchased reduce cost of product as inventory is sold. Rebates that are based on sales volume are offset to cost of product when we determine that they have been earned based on sales volume of related products.

g) Income taxes

Income tax expense comprises current and deferred tax. Income tax expense is recognized in net earnings except to the extent that it relates to items recognized directly in equity, in which case it is recognized directly in equity or in other comprehensive income.

Current income tax is the expected tax payable (recoverable) on the taxable income for the year, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date, and any adjustment to tax payable (recoverable) in respect of previous years.

Deferred income tax is recognized on temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and the corresponding tax bases used in the computation of taxable income. Deferred income tax liabilities are generally recognized for all taxable temporary differences. Deferred income tax assets are generally recognized for all deductible temporary differences to the extent that it is probable that taxable income will be available against which those deductible temporary differences can be utilized.

The carrying amount of deferred income tax assets is reviewed at the end of each reporting period and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable income will be available to allow all or part of the asset to be recovered.

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply in the period in which the liability is settled or the asset realized, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the end of the reporting period.

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to set off current income tax assets against current income tax liabilities and when they relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority.

h) Financial instruments

All financial assets and financial liabilities are initially recognized at fair value. The subsequent measurement of financial instruments depends on their classification as follows:

Where commodity derivative contracts under master netting arrangements include both asset and liability positions, we offset the fair value amounts recognized for multiple similar derivative instruments executed with the same counterparty, including any related cash collateral asset or obligation. Transaction costs of financial instruments are recorded as a reduction of the cost of the instruments except for costs of financial instruments classified as fair value through profit or loss, which are expensed as incurred.

i) Cash and cash equivalents

Cash equivalents are carried at fair value, and consist of short-term investments with an original maturity of three months or less.

j) Accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts

We evaluate collectability of specific customer receivables depending on the nature of the sale. Collectability of receivables is reviewed and the allowance for doubtful accounts is adjusted on an ongoing basis. Account balances are charged to net earnings when we determine that it is probable that the receivable will not be collected. Interest accrues on all trade receivables from the due date, which may vary with certain geographic or seasonal programs.

We have facilities in the U.S. and Australia that enable us to sell certain short-term trade accounts receivable to third parties on an ongoing basis. We continue to service the sold accounts receivable; amounts associated with the servicing liability are not material. We record sales and derecognize accounts receivable when the arrangement transfers substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the receivables to a third party. Where this does not occur, the arrangements are recorded as secured borrowings.

k) Inventories

Wholesale inventories, consisting primarily of crop nutrients, operating supplies and raw materials, include both direct and indirect production and purchase costs, depreciation and amortization on assets employed directly in production, and freight to transport the product to the storage facilities. Crop nutrients include our produced products and products purchased for resale. Operating supplies include catalysts used in the production process, materials used for repairs and maintenance and other supplies. Inventories are valued at the lower of cost on a weighted-average basis and net realizable value.

Retail inventories, consisting primarily of crop nutrients, crop protection products, seed and merchandise include the cost of delivery to move the product to storage facilities. Inventories are recorded at the lower of cost on a weighted-average basis and net realizable value.

Advanced Technologies inventories, consisting primarily of raw materials and controlled-release products, include both direct and indirect production costs and depreciation on assets employed directly in production. Inventories are recorded at the lower of cost determined on a first-in, first-out basis and net realizable value.

l) Property, plant and equipment

Property, plant and equipment are measured at historical cost less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment loss. The cost of property, plant and equipment comprises its purchase price and any costs directly attributable to bringing the asset to the location and condition necessary for it to be capable of operating in the manner intended by management. If a legal or constructive obligation exists to decommission property, plant and equipment, the discounted value of the obligation is included in the carrying value of the assets when the obligation arises.

Expenses in connection with day-to-day maintenance and repairs are recognized in the statement of operations as they are incurred. Expenses incurred in connection with major replacements, plant turnarounds and renewals that materially extend the life of property, plant and equipment or result in future economic benefits are capitalized and depreciated on a systematic basis. The carrying amount of replaced components is expensed.

If the construction or preparation for use of property, plant or equipment extends over a period of longer than twelve months, the borrowing costs incurred on borrowed capital up to the date of completion are capitalized as part of the cost of acquisition or construction.

Property, plant and equipment are depreciated on a straight-line basis using the following estimated useful lives:

If the cost of an individual part of property, plant and equipment is significant relative to the total cost of the item, the individual part is accounted for and depreciated separately. Expected useful life and residual value is re-assessed annually.

m) Goodwill and intangible assets

Goodwill represents the difference between the fair value of the consideration transferred in a business combination and the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired at the date of acquisition. Goodwill is initially determined based on provisional fair values. Fair values are finalized within 12 months of the acquisition date. Goodwill on acquisition of subsidiaries and jointly controlled entities is separately disclosed and goodwill on acquisitions of associates is included within investments in equity accounted units. Goodwill, including goodwill in equity accounted units, is not amortized; rather it is tested annually for impairment or when there is an indication of impairment.

Intangible assets acquired as part of an acquisition of a business are capitalized separately from goodwill if the asset is separable or arises from contractual or legal rights, and the fair value can be measured reliably on initial recognition.

Purchased intangible assets are initially recorded at cost and finite-lived intangible assets are amortized over their useful economic lives on a straight-line basis. Intangible assets having indefinite lives and intangible assets that are not yet ready for use are not amortized and are tested annually for impairment or when there is an indication of impairment.

Intangible assets are considered to have indefinite lives when, based on an analysis of all of the relevant factors, there is no foreseeable limit to the period over which the asset is expected to generate cash flows for us. The factors considered in making this determination include the existence of contractual rights for unlimited terms; or evidence that renewal of the contractual rights without significant incremental cost can be expected for indefinite periods into the future in view of our future investment intentions. The life cycles of the products and processes that depend on the asset are also considered.

The following useful lives, which are re-assessed annually, have been determined for classes of finite-lived intangible assets:

n) Impairment

The carrying amounts of non-current assets are reviewed at each reporting date to determine whether there is any indication of impairment. If any indication of impairment exists, then the asset's recoverable amount is estimated. For goodwill and intangible assets that have indefinite lives or that are not yet available for use, the recoverable amount is estimated each year during the third quarter.

The recoverable amount of an asset or cash generating unit is the greater of its value in use and its fair value less costs to sell. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset. For the purpose of impairment testing, assets are grouped together into the smallest group of assets that have the ability to generate cash inflows from continuing use that are largely independent of the cash inflows of other assets or groups of assets (the "cash generating unit"). The goodwill acquired in a business combination, for the purpose of impairment testing, is allocated to cash generating units or groups of cash generating units that are expected to benefit from the synergies of the combination and reflects the lowest level at which goodwill is monitored for internal reporting purposes. If there is an indication of an impairment of an asset or cash generating unit below the level to which goodwill has been allocated, the asset or cash generating unit is tested for impairment first and any impairment loss for that asset or cash generating unit is recognized before testing at the level to which goodwill has been allocated.

An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of an asset or its cash generating unit exceeds its estimated recoverable amount. Impairment losses are recognized in net earnings. Impairment losses recognized in respect of cash generating units are allocated first to reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill allocated to the units and then to reduce the carrying amounts of the other assets in the unit on a pro-rata basis.

An impairment loss in respect of goodwill is not reversed. In respect of other assets, impairment losses recognized in prior periods are assessed at each reporting date for any indications that the loss has decreased or no longer exists. An impairment loss is reversed if there has been a change in the estimates used to determine the recoverable amount. An impairment loss is reversed only to the extent that the asset's carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of depreciation or amortization, if no impairment loss had been recognized.

Goodwill that forms part of the carrying amount of an investment in an associate is not recognized separately, and therefore is not tested for impairment separately. Instead, the entire amount of the investment in an associate is tested for impairment as a single asset when there is objective evidence that the investment in an associate may be impaired.

o) Leases

Leases whereby we assume substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership are classified as finance leases. Upon initial recognition the leased asset is measured at an amount equal to the lower of its fair value and the present value of the minimum lease payments. Subsequent to initial recognition, the asset is accounted for in accordance with the accounting policy applicable to that asset. Minimum lease payments made under finance leases are apportioned between the finance cost and the reduction of the outstanding liability. The finance cost is allocated to each period during the lease term so as to produce a constant periodic rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability.

Other leases are operating leases and are not recognized on our balance sheet. Payments made under operating leases are recognized in net earnings over the term of the lease.

p) Post-employment benefits

We maintain contributory and non-contributory defined benefit and defined contribution pension plans in Canada and the United States. The majority of employees are members of defined contribution pension plans. We also maintain health care plans and life insurance benefits for retired employees. Benefits from defined benefit plans are based on either a percentage of final average earnings and years of service or a flat dollar amount for each year of service. Pension plan and post-retirement benefit costs are determined annually by independent actuaries and include current service costs, interest cost of projected benefits, return on plan assets and actuarial gains or losses. We also have non-contributory defined benefit and defined contribution plans which provide supplementary pension benefits for senior management.

Post-employment benefits are funded by us and obligations are determined using the projected unit credit method of actuarial valuation prorated over the expected length of employee service. Post-employment benefit costs for current service, interest costs and return on plan assets are charged to net earnings in the year incurred. Actuarial gains or losses are recognized immediately in other comprehensive income. Past service costs and the effects of changes in plan assumptions are amortized on a straight-line basis over the average period until the benefits become vested, or immediately if the benefits have already vested. Our contributions to defined contribution post-employment benefit plans are expensed as incurred.

Short-term employee benefit obligations are measured on an undiscounted basis and are expensed as the related service is provided. Liabilities for bonuses and profit-sharing are recognized based on a formula that takes into consideration the profit attributable to our shareholders after certain adjustments. We recognize a liability when we have a present legal or constructive obligation to pay this amount as a result of past service provided by the employee, and the obligation can be estimated reliably.

q) Provisions

A provision is recognized if, as a result of a past event, we have a present legal or constructive obligation that can be estimated reliably, and it is more likely than not that an outflow of economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation. Where the effect of discounting is material, the expected future cash flows associated with a provision are discounted at a pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money. The unwinding of the discount is recognized as a finance cost.

Environmental remediation

Environmental expenditures that relate to existing conditions caused by past operations that do not contribute to current or future revenue generation are expensed. Environmental expenditures that extend the life of the property, increase its capacity or mitigate or prevent contamination from future operations are capitalized. Costs are recorded when environmental remediation efforts are probable and the costs can be reliably estimated based on current law and existing technologies. Estimated costs are based on management's best estimate of undiscounted future costs.

Decommissioning and restoration

Provisions for decommissioning and restoration costs (asset retirement obligations) are measured based on current requirements, technology and price levels and the present value is calculated using amounts discounted over the useful economic life of the assets. The liability is recognized in the period when there is a legal or constructive obligation and a reasonable estimate can be made. A corresponding item of property, plant and equipment of an amount equivalent to the provision is also recognized and is subsequently depreciated as part of the asset. The effects of changes resulting from revisions to the timing or the amount of the original estimate of the provision are reflected on a prospective basis, by adjustment to the carrying amount of the related property, plant and equipment.

r) Share-based payments

Cash-settled plans are accounted for as liabilities where the fair value of the award is determined at the grant date using a valuation model which includes an estimated forfeiture rate. A Black-Scholes option pricing model is used for plans with a service condition and a Monte Carlo simulation model is used for plans with service and market conditions. Compensation expense is accrued, and recognized over the vesting period of the award. The fair value is re-measured at each balance sheet date and fluctuations in the fair value are recognized in the period in which the fluctuation occurs.

Equity-settled plans are accounted for using a fair value-based method. The fair value of the share-based award is determined at the grant date using a market-based option valuation model which includes an estimated forfeiture rate. The fair value of the award is recorded as compensation expense amortized over the vesting period of the award, with a corresponding increase to share capital. On e


Themen in dieser Pressemitteilung:


Unternehmensinformation / Kurzprofil:



Leseranfragen:



PresseKontakt / Agentur:



drucken  als PDF  an Freund senden  Intergraph(R) CAESAR II(R) Productivity Training Course on September 12-16 in Houston, Texas to Focus on Static Pipe Stress Analysis
Clorox Reports Strong 4% Sales and 20% EPS Growth in Q4; Updates Fiscal Year 2012 Outlook
Bereitgestellt von Benutzer: MARKET WIRE
Datum: 03.08.2011 - 04:30 Uhr
Sprache: Deutsch
News-ID 1026941
Anzahl Zeichen: 0

contact information:
Contact person:
Town:

CALGARY, ALBERTA


Phone:

Kategorie:

Commodity Chemicals


Anmerkungen:


Diese Pressemitteilung wurde bisher 228 mal aufgerufen.


Die Pressemitteilung mit dem Titel:
"Agrium Reports Record Second Quarter
"
steht unter der journalistisch-redaktionellen Verantwortung von

Agrium Inc. (Nachricht senden)

Beachten Sie bitte die weiteren Informationen zum Haftungsauschluß (gemäß TMG - TeleMedianGesetz) und dem Datenschutz (gemäß der DSGVO).


Alle Meldungen von Agrium Inc.



 

Who is online

All members: 10 563
Register today: 0
Register yesterday: 2
Members online: 0
Guests online: 69


Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.