Equal Rights for the Classic Perspectives on Gender
In a research project funded by the Austrian Science Fund FWF, Silvia Stoller has risked a
daringly fresh interpretation of the classic approaches to feminist gender research. The results
have now been published in her book "Existenz – Differenz – Konstruktion. Phänomenologie
der Geschlechtlichkeit bei Beauvoir, Irigaray und Butler", which will be presented on 11
January 2011. In her work, the author shows, for the first time, how views relating to feminist
gender studies, which are seemingly mutually exclusive, can actually be drawn upon to form
constructive criticism that is relevant to our contemporary society.
(firmenpresse) - Women are equal. Or different? Or do they exist at all? These questions – put simply –
paraphrase the three distinctive positions in gender research of the 20th century.
Simone de Beauvoir advocates gender equality and demands that women be given the
same rights as men. Seemingly diametrically opposed is Luce Irigaray’s difference theory.
According to this approach, there should be no attempt to find common ground between
the sexes; instead we should – in a positive sense – reinforce and develop more
differences between men and women. The third position is based on the principle of
construction according to Judith Butler, which stipulates that genders as such are
unnatural. Gender-specific interpretations are total cultural constructs.
These three theoretical approaches seem, at first glance, contradictory. However, in her
book, which will be presented on Tuesday 11 January 2011 at 7 pm in the Depot, Breite
Gasse 3, 1070 Vienna, author Dr. Silvia Stoller demonstrates that they are not. According
to the motto "It is time to give the classic gender theories of the 20th century a new
reading!" Dr. Stoller challenged herself to find a brand new connection between these
ideas. Her study clearly shows that there is significant overlap between the three
theoretical approaches, and that they even complement each other.
Classic, New Sexuality
"If you look closer at, for instance, the work of Beauvoir, you realize that, although she
called for equality, she saw the need for recognizing differences. The demand for equal
rights and the principle of equal treatment of the genders did not imply, in her opinion, that
the genders should become more alike", explains Dr. Stoller. Moreover, in her difference
theory, Irigaray does not exclude the possibility that sexual difference can be accompanied
by political demands for equality. For example, she herself advocated that women should
fight for their own rights, rather than exercise the rights of others without criticism. If you
then look at it from Judith Butler’s perspective of construction, sexual difference can be
viewed as a pure construct of society. However, contrary to the generally established
opinion, Dr. Stoller believes that this does not automatically mean a negation of the whole
concept of gender.
The fact that these three brands of classic feminist theory still have much to teach us
today, can be seen in the following current examples: Beavoir’s call for equality is by no
means antiquated; in many areas, for instance, men and women are still paid different
wages for the same job. In our multicultural society, it also seems more urgent than ever to
strive to recognize our differences, as called for by Luce Irigaray. Finally, we need to keep
an eye on the gender constructs of our society, as they indicate normative sexuality and
offer prospects for change. The insights from these three approaches therefore represent
a permanent challenge.
(Not) an Everyday Phenomenon
The scientist’s method of choice for her published analyses was phenomenology, which
considers sexuality as a basic trait of human existence. At the same time, the method
allows a discourse on existence, difference and construction, without committing
completely to either of the theoretical approaches, as described by Dr. Stoller: "I wanted to
embark on a kind of journey across tradition. By using phenomenology, sexuality can be
made the subject, without giving preference to one or the other of the positions. That way I
was able to outline the overlap between the theories appropriately."
In order to facilitate the reader’s access to her work, the author divided her book into two
parts: In the first part, she explains basic definitions and relevant theories. Building on
these initial clarifications, she carries out her analyses in the second part. She does this by
examining all three major feminist theories. In her opinion, that is the only way to cover the
complex phenomena of sexuality properly. In conducting her research as part of the
project funded by the Austrian Science Fund FWF, Dr. Stoller hopes that it will provoke
new ideas for future phenomenological and feminist studies.
Picture and text available from Tuesday, 11 January, 9 a.m. CET onwards:
http://www.fwf.ac.at/en/public_relations/press/pv201101-en.html
Original publication: Silvia Stoller: Existenz – Differenz – Konstruktion. Phänomenologie
der Geschlechtlichkeit bei Beauvoir, Irigaray und Butler. Wilhelm Fink Verlag 2010. ISBN:
978-3-7705-4907-8
Scientific contact:
Univ.-Doz. Dr. Silvia Stoller PhD
University of Vienna
Institut für Philosophie
Universitätsstraße 7
1010 Vienna
M +43 / 699 121 77 444
E silvia.stoller(at)univie.ac.at
Austrian Science Fund FWF:
Mag. Stefan Bernhardt
Haus der Forschung
Sensengasse 1
1090 Vienna
T +43 / 1 / 505 67 40 - 8111
E stefan.bernhardt(at)fwf.ac.at
Editorial & Broadcasting Office:
PR&D - Public Relations for Research & Education
Mariannengasse 8
1090 Vienna
T +43 / 1 / 505 70 44
E contact(at)prd.at
W http://www.prd.at
Vienna, 11th January 2011
Themen in dieser Pressemitteilung:
Unternehmensinformation / Kurzprofil:
Datum: 12.01.2011 - 08:26 Uhr
Sprache: Deutsch
News-ID 1020933
Anzahl Zeichen: 0
contact information:
Contact person:
Town:
Phone:
Kategorie:
Research & Development
Anmerkungen:
Diese Pressemitteilung wurde bisher 291 mal aufgerufen.
Die Pressemitteilung mit dem Titel:
"Equal Rights for the Classic Perspectives on Gender
"
steht unter der journalistisch-redaktionellen Verantwortung von
PR&D - Public Relations for Research & Education (Nachricht senden)
Beachten Sie bitte die weiteren Informationen zum Haftungsauschluß (gemäß TMG - TeleMedianGesetz) und dem Datenschutz (gemäß der DSGVO).
